Tag: United Nations

Posted on

Obama, the United Nations, Tzipi Livni and the Coming Global Shadow Government

With recent reports of the potential for Tzipi Livni to become deputy to the UN Secretary General, many pro-Israel activists see this as a positive development, but nothing could be further from the truth. With Donald Trump’s historic victory and Israel’s continuing movement to the right, the global elite are trying desperately to enhance their ability to undercut President Trump and the growing realignment of world powers.

Financial backers like George Soros are working overtime to utilize former-President Obama’s residency in Washington DC as the address and engine behind the newest social protest movement which is amalgamated from the Organizing for Change (OFC). The OFC has been Obama’s grass roots organizing tool for social and political change during his years as president. Instead of this organization going into retirement, it is being revved up to oppose Trump at every turn.

Tzippy Livni as Deputy Secretary General will Work Against Netanyahu

As reported by the Jerusalem post, a Tzipi Livni appointment as Deputy-Secretary General of the UN does not “require the official approval of the Israeli government nor of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, unlike the role of UN envoys, which requires the confirmation of the Security Council.” This means she would be able to undermine the duly elected government of Israel without recourse. This would effectively create an over arching global shadow government led by Obama in Washington DC and the UN all financed by Soros and other global elite.   The aim is to continue to delegitimize Israel, this time through one of its own, as well as turning the American street against a sitting President and his policies.

As the global hierarchy created since World War 1 and cemented after World War 2 continues to crumble expect the UN, Obama, and the EU to take increasingly drastic measures.  There will be an attempt to cause large scale civil unrest in the United States (this will be egged on Obama and the OFC).  Also the EU, ever fearful of growing relations between the USA, Britain, and Russia will attempt to sabotage the realignment by any means necessary.

The NY Post reports on the speed in which Obama is racing forward with his plans:

“He’s doing it through a network of leftist nonprofits led by Organizing for Action. Normally you’d expect an organization set up to support a politician and his agenda to close up shop after that candidate leaves office, but not Obama’s OFA. Rather, it’s gearing up for battle, with a growing war chest and more than 250 offices across the country.”

Those who believe the worst is now over after Trump’s victory, are mistaken. The real revolution for global control has begun.

[huge_it_share]

Posted on

Will Congress Officially Rebuke the United Nations Tomorrow?

Although surprisingly quiet after UNSC Resolution 2334 was passed, the Congress has been quietly planning its political attack against the UN and the Obama Administration after being sworn in tomorrow.

Sen. Jerry Moran, R-Kan., plans to introduce a “sense of the Senate” which will issue a rebuke of the United Nations. The formal condemnation resolution could one of countless measures the Congress is planning against the U.N. by in response to the Security Council resolution

“I am committed to working with both Republicans and Democrats to make sure we stand with Israel and that the United Nations cannot be used as a forum to create policies that hurt our nation and its allies,” Moran said Friday.

Other possible moves may include Senator Lindsay Grahm’s push to defund the United Nations. Although supported by a number of senators, Senate Republican Leadership has yet to support it openly.

 

Posted on

Time to Say Bye to the UN

It appears the UN has once again spent the day condemning Israel. In all, 6 resolutions bashing Israel were passed on one day last week. One of the resolutions called for Israel to withdraw from the Golan Heights and to return the area to the Syrian Government – yes, the same one that is currently (TODAY!!) massacring civilians in Aleppo and throughout Syria. This is the same Syrian Government that is under the complete control of Hezbollah and Iran. This is the same Syrian Government that has used chemical weapons on civilians. And on and on.

Israel has aleady controlled the Golan Heights for nearly 50 years – longer than Syria ever controlled it (47 years). In that time, Israel has officially annexed the area and the Jewish population has gradually increased. It now stands around 25,000 – with concrete plans to increase to well over 30,000 in the near future.

These previous realities starkly display how irrelevant and worthless the recent UN resolution is for all practical purposes. There is no question as to the future of the Golan Heights – they will always be part of Israel. The question is, how should Israel respond to this resolution and the others that were passed.  Additionally, there are constant threats of further UN resolutions and even Security Council resolutions against Israel.

Israel should quit the United Nations. Effective Immediately! 

By continuing to be members of this ridiculous “organization”, Israel gives some level of legitimacy to the nonsense that is regularly spewed there. This is the same group that disputes a Jewish connection to Jerusalem, that relegates random arabs to “palestinian refugee status”, that refuses to actually stop genocides around the world and that actively aids Israel’s enemies in times of military conflict. And that’s a very partial list of their complicity to evil.

The Jewish Nation is called upon to “dwell alone” and we are callled upon to be a “light unto the nations”. We can accomplish neither as members of the United Nations. Its time to embrace our destiny and our reponsibility. For our own sake and the sake of the nations of the world, Israel should say Bye to the United Nations.

[huge_it_share]

Posted on

Dismantling the Right of Return

The Palestinian demand for the “Right of Return” has long been a core belief set to the broader peace narrative in relation to a permanent settlement with Israel.  On the face of it, the demand seems pretty solid, that is of course if one buys into the Palestinian narrative without questioning the very basis of its claims.

Palestinians claim the following:

  • Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country. -Article 13(2), Universal Declaration of Human Rights (10 December 1948).
  • The Geneva Conventions of 1949.
  • The General Assembly, Having considered further the situation in Palestine … Resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbors should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible.” -UN General Assembly Resolution 194 (11 December 1948)
  • United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3236 which “reaffirms also the inalienable right of the Palestinians to return to their homes and property from which they have been displaced and uprooted, and calls for their return”.
  • Resolution 242 from the UN affirms the necessity for “achieving a just settlement of the refugee problem.”
  • Supporters of the Palestinian right of return maintain that “the right of return for the 1948 Palestinian refugees still exists according to international law. It exists despite the language of the Oslo agreements, insufficient as they are in this regard, and despite the position of the current Israeli government. Palestinian refugees should be free to seek their right to repatriation, regardless of what the PLO acquiesces to, so long as UN Resolution 194 remains in force”.
  • No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of the right to enter his own country. -Article 12, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights(23 March 1976).

The main crux  behind using many of the above statements lies with attaching the Palestinian Right of Return to something national.

After all, Israel has the Law of Return, which designates any Jew or a person that has 1/4 Jewish ancestry as eligible to return to his/her ancestral homeland.  The Palestinians argue that if a Jew can return after a hiatus of of 1,700 to 2,00 years then they who were here in between should certainly be aloud back.

Essentially speaking the Palestinian claim and statements from international treaties that seem to support it do so because refugees and their return depend on origins within a recognized national entity.

Between the years 1917 and 1948, as the modern Nation States of the Middle East were being created by world powers, no one believed there to be unique nation called Palestine.  In fact all references to Palestine connected the word to Jews and their inalienable rights to form a Nation State their. Why?  Because simply speaking, the current Palestinians had no Nation in the Levant.  This is not to say they were not there, they were or at least a percentage of them were, but they had no previous national claim to the Land.  Some were considered Syrians and other Egyptians, but none of them used the word Palestinian or connected themselves to a distinct national heritage in defining themselves.

Ryan Bellerose, a native Metas from Canada wrote an excellent piece this week refuting Palestinian claims to being indigenous. National indigenous rights are a key component hen tackling issues connected to refugees and this is why Palestinians who formed their collective narrative as an anti-narrative to Israel and Jewish rights there are some forceful in trying to prove that themselves had some sort of national collective experience that was taken from them.  If not, then their claims to deserving a right of return falls through.

One cannot build a national narrative whose sole foundation is the negation of another people’s narrative. That is not a legitimate narrative nor is it something that deserves the right of return.

It is clear that a right of return should belong to the one cultural group that exerted itself time and time again as the national sovereign in the Land of Israel and that is he people of Israel.  It is true individual rights should be given to all persons that live in the Land of Israel.  That does not make them a historically indigenous people nor does it give them the right to claim a return generations later.