PEAK AMERICA: Has Islam Already Defeated the USA?

The fall of a country never happens from outside forces attacking headon in “broad daylight.” Empires collapse due to internal stresses and the quiet snatching of key levers of control from within.

The more one learns about Hillary Clinton’s foundation work as well as her loyal assistant Huma Abedin already well entrenched during Ms. Clinton’s time as Secretary of State, the more it becomes apparent that Islam has already taken control of much of the froeign policy decisions of the US government.

It has recently been revealed that Huma worked as a senior employee at her mother’s radical Islamic journal as recently as 2008.  The journal attacks Western values and even decries the place of the woman in the Western world. In one such article Huma’s mother said the following:

“‘Empowerment’ of women does more harm than benefit the cause of women or their relations with men,” Saleha Mahmood Abedin maintained. “By placing women in the ‘care and protection’ of men and by making women responsible for those under her charge,” she argued, “Islamic values generate a sense of compassion in human and family relations.”

“Among all systems of belief, Islam goes the farthest in restoring equality across gender,” she claimed. “Acknowledging the very central role women play in procreation, child-raising and homemaking, Islam places the economic responsibility of supporting the family primarily on the male members.”

The issue here is not whether the values of the west in the case of “women’s liberation” should necessarily be cherished above that of traditional societies, afterall there is a lot to say for safeguarding the traditional role of women as the anchor for the household. Further more radical feminism has been noted by many outside the Islamic world as a potentialy destructive force. The real issue with having someone like Huma being in earshot of the potentially future president is not her personal values, but rather creating a gateway for clearly Wahhabist thought to be inside the oval office, if it isn’t already.

The journal also attacked America over its role in the Middle East and in doing so indicated that the 9/11 attacks were even justified.

“The spiral of violence having continued unabated worldwide, and widely seen to be allowed to continue, was building up intense anger and hostility within the pressure cooker that was kept on a vigorous flame while the lid was weighted down with various kinds of injustices and sanctions . . . It was a time bomb that had to explode and explode it did on September 11, changing in its wake the life and times of the very community and the people it aimed to serve.”

The above revelations concerning Huma’s role in her mother’s journal coupled with fact that the Clinton’s have notoriously created a pay for play relationship with terror sponsors through their foundation makes for a very dangerous development.  Of course with the eight years of open door policy concerning Islamic hate leaders under the Obama administration, Islam in the form of Muslim Brotherhood affiliated groups and other salients have been visiting the current President throughout his term.  The only difference with Hillary is that it will assurely become far more open and accepted.

Huma Abedin: Yes, Hamas Would Honor Accord on Peace with Israel

The 30 thousand plus Hillary Clinton emails found o WikiLeaks are treasure trove of information.  In 2010 according to one email with the subject: (Reuters) Hamas would honor referendum on peace with Israel, Huma Abedin, Hillary Clinton’s trusted aid and Saudi national answers a back and forth on a reuters article dealing with a Hamas acceptance of an Israeli-Arab peace accord, with just one word: Yes.

One can infer that Huma was giving  credance to naive State Department officials who truly believed and probably still do that Hamas is just a political/social group who at the end of the day will bend.

It is clear if Huma Abedin has changed her mind. This is even after two wars since the email, where Hamas rained rockets down on Israeli populaton centers, but one must assume and believe the US officials think differently now. The question one must ask in assessing whether or not a canidate is particularly pro-Israel or at least supportive of Israeli positions, is if they are surrounded by people who reflect that.

For Hillary to take advice from her Saudi aid on geopolitical manners concerning a country that until recently her country would rather see drown in the Meditereanean seems at the least naive and at the most down right incompetant if not worse.

What will this sort of approach mean for Hillary getting into the White House?  Not much, but if Assange is telling us the truth and there are emails in the next batch that confirm Hillary gaive permisson to fund ISIS then, this email and others provide a perfect background to understanding approach that Hillary ad her staff take with regards to foreign affairs.